| = thoughts... | Marius Surleac [06.May.08 10:49] |
| Bogdan, here's a metaphysical thought about creation, about "A priori-A posteriori" tools for a good understanding ethics, philosophical theories and absolute truth as you said, which rather is a A priori intuition and statement. If there are A posteriori theories dicovered, then A posteriori observations are equal to zero. I see your text more like a "Kritik der reinen Vernunft" of Immanuel Kant. Is all about metaphysics. By the way, can you tell me what is physics theory of everything that has to be dicovered, now that you've mentioned - Maybe you wanted to say "The Great Theory of Unification" Cheers! | |
| = Marius Surleac, | Bogdan G. Marin [06.May.08 12:04] |
| Yes I have read Kant and not only his "Critique of Pure Reason" but his "Critique of Practical Reason". The philosophers who had a great impact on me, till now are Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Goldman, Proudhon, Marx and Engels, Petre Tutea (not such a big impact though), Emil Cioran, Seneca, Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Max Nordau (by him I have only read "Minciunile Conventionale ale civilizatiei noastre"), Jacques Derrida, Sartre (existentialism, Kafka as well and many other writers), Tolstoy, Gandhi, Indian philosophy and Chinese philosophy. And I will read more, and re-read all of these authors, their most important works though I have read some that did not affect me at all because I already new about such things. Take for example Plato and the "Philosopher King", before I began to read Plato at 15 I thought it would be much more productive to have a Philosopher President and the entire parliament to be made out of intellectuals. Philosophers, usually, are honest and look for the Supreme Good (eudaimonia - this after I read Plato). Eudaimonia meaning wisdom as an end in itself. This is one example, another is the book "Filosophy of Magic" by Eugeniu Sperantia; this did not affect me. I will read, if I can find and wish I can find - a book about Synarchism; I have heard about this philosophy (political-theological)and about Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre on TV, and then searched online, but I can`t find a free book - what I found are only some few ideas... Well... in the end... the Vedas (not all) and the Bibile. -- Well "The Great Theory of Unification" (GUT) is not "The Theory of Everything" (TOE). TOE combines the magnetic force, electric force, electromagnetism, the weak force, electroweak force, the strong force, electronuclear force (GUT) and gravity. | |
| = until now... | Bogdan G. Marin [06.May.08 12:05] |
| Until now, we know that God exists but we cannot find Him through scientific means but we can find Him through love, as any Christian will say. So works with the Absolute Theory of Philosophy, we know that a theory is true if it is universal and we know that an Absolute Theory of Philosophy... is there, exists but we need to find it by some mean. So might this be a "mean"? - By deconstructing, re-constructing. Two nights ago I tried to find out how to unite all theories of ethics, or all theories of knowledge, and so on. I had come up after, let`s say five minutes, with this "Genealogical Tree" theory... but I remembered about Deconstructivism! but even so it would not work only with deconstructivism alone, one must unite... deconstructivism itself with another theory so that one can have a "tool" to create the Absolute Theory of Ethics (eg). | |
| = conclusions... | Marius Surleac [06.May.08 12:16] |
Ok! You can call "Theory of every thing" from the philosophical point of view, but trust me that the theory is call of Unification, because is about how to keep under control all mechanical, nuclear, gravitational and electrical forces together, but not how to unify them. As a physicist I can tell you what is all about this theory: as I said the main purpose of the theory is to find and know perfectly well the laws from the base of the forces and, until now all forces can be kept under control (nuclear, weak and strong, electrical forces) but the only force that is not well understood and physicist from entire the world try to figure about is the Gravity force, because no one can modify gravitational forces. That's why this theory is called like that because it tries the 100% control on them! Finally, I am glad to find out that you've read so much brilliant mind of philosophy as Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Cioran, Seneca, Plato and most extraordinary (from my own point of view) Indian philosophy and especially Vedas - I have read only the Veda-Upanishad. Cheers and good work! | |
| = Well... concluding | Bogdan G. Marin [06.May.08 14:04] |
| Ah! Well as you have seen I am not a physicist but yes... in physics it is important how to control the forces. And yes I know that gravity is not yet understood. I am working on a theory of great magnitude... at least I hope so. Even so... I must keep in mind that the end, the goal is to unite the most important philosophies and not only creating a philosophy that is for the simple man, the intellectual but as well a political philosophy - to help society itself. Because politicians must look for the Supreme Good as an end in itself! for the people... so far from the politicians of today. I do know that the philosophy I am preparing for the world it is not only the absolute practical-theory, as I am trying with all my potential - and beyond - but also an eutopian philosophy... though I hope nature it is not utopian! Thank you! | |
| = desires overcome... | Bogdan G. Marin [06.May.08 14:05] |
| I never read African philosophy! - And this kind of worries me... well I have time I guess - though I do not have time. You know that it is said "Live the moment" - "Traieste Clipa", but it is important how you "live the moment", either searching and trying to reach wisdom or just indulging in irrational pleasures. I asked myself once if ethics affect your liberty or indulging in pleasures affect your liberty. If I am jailed or others are jailed. Those of my age (17-18), I think few search for wisdom and meditate upon the problems of the world at such an age, most just indulge in pleasures. But I reached the conclusion that those who indulge in such pleasures (irrational pleasures) are jailed; not those who have reached wisdom, because those who have reached wisdom have learned to control themselves, to control their desires, their irrational part, animal part; instead of those who must put an end to their desires just to become overwhelmed by other desires. | |