| + reco | Veronica Vãleanu [28.Mar.13 10:28] |
| I like how the discourse is somehow shatterproof, and then there emerges a sort of crinkle effect and the tone of the voice is noble, it doesn't ransack for that human touch we can feel here and there, well-poised well, those "needles of time" are a very good conterpoise for the fabric of zoom-outs you are weaving here out from differentiated structures, alluvia and sediments and they are well thrusted into zoom-ins, like a moment left on a veranda. very good. VV. | |
| = Veronica's poetic critique | Ronald E Shields [28.Mar.13 20:10] |
| Thank you Veronica. Once again I am left with the feeling that your critique is more poetic than the poem I have written. Please accept my appreciation for your time, and thoughtful comments. Ron | |
| = What | John Willy Kopperud [30.Mar.13 12:00] |
| -can a poor boy do, but to join in the praise here. Man as an artist is the one who can persuade all kinds of phenomena to walk down the catwalk of fiction. As for Veronicas comments; this one about the fabric of things, essential to the text, is yet another of many splendid ones on these pages. Cheers from Willy | |
| = ...and what | Ronald E Shields [31.Mar.13 16:02] |
| can the other poor boy do, but say thank you for giving time to my poetry. Cheers to you Willy. Ron | |